DARC Research · Ukraine's Chinese Component Gaps

Supply chain gaps

NATO and allied defence companies
can close in Ukraine

For component and material makers. Ukraine now makes finished drone parts. The Chinese dependency has moved upstream, into the sensor dies, cells, magnets and materials inside them. We name suppliers outside China and the routes to close each gap.

Pages 35Exhibits 11 Component classes 18Sources 271
Download the report ↓ Discuss your entry into Ukraine →
PDF · 35 pages · Research cut-off 14 September 2026
Ukraine's Chinese Component Gaps and Who Can Close Them, DARC Research, report cover
The research

What we set out
to answer

Our research team, led by Maksym Kovalenko, read Ukraine's drone supply chain at three layers: the finished part, the sub-component inside it and the materials behind it. Then we looked for who outside China can supply each layer.

01We mapped 18 component classes, from magnets and battery cells to optical fibre and engines, and found the layer where China sits in each
02We showed why China wins each layer, on price, capability or material, and what a non-Chinese option costs today
03We named suppliers outside China, the routes into Ukrainian supply chains, the grants and the buyers who pay for origin
PDF · 35 pages · Public sources only, 271 listed in Annex B
Contents

What is inside

01Key findings Eight findings on where the dependency sits now
02How the dependency moved upstream Price, capability and material
03Layer map 18 component classes on two pages
04Seven chokepoints Made in Ukraine, where China wins, who can close it
05Eleven more component classes From carbon frames to production tooling
06The tier above the chokepoints Chinese controls and dates to watch
07Dependencies outside the component classes Third-country routing and Announcement No. 30
08Routes for a non-Chinese supplier Supply, licensed production, joint programmes, nearshore
09Grant coverage by layer What the calls fund and what they skip
10Risks and counter-evidence Supply, tax and payment terms
11Evidence gaps What public data cannot show yet
A·BAnnexes China's share by customs code, and sources
Seven chokepoints NdFeB magnetsBattery cellsThermal imaging Optical fibreVideo and control linksFlight electronicsMavic-class platforms
Section 01 · Key findings

Eight findings.
The gap moved upstream

01Upstream

Ukraine makes finished parts. The dependency moved upstream

China supplied 38% of Ukraine's drone component imports by value in H1 2025, according to the Ukrainian Council of Defense Industry and Snake Island Institute.

02Chokepoints

The deepest chokepoints are materials and sensor dies

China holds about 91% of rare-earth separation and refining and 94% of sintered magnet output. Ukraine makes no thermal sensor dies.

03Tier above

One tier up, China's share rises

China produced 99% of primary low-purity gallium. No Chinese rule aimed at Ukraine was found. The Ukraine-specific friction is allied licensing: the EU001 general authorisation excludes Ukraine.

04Cost and volume

Non-Chinese supply costs more and is small against Ukrainian volume

A year of EU thermal camera output would cover 3 to 4 months of Ukrainian need, at 4 to 5 times the cost, Odd Systems says.

05Routing

Chinese dependence also runs outside the component classes

Chinese parts reach Ukraine via third countries, and the Chinese distributor LCSC stopped taking orders from Ukraine.

06Origin rules

Origin is paid for only in specific channels

SAFE-financed procurement caps components from outside the EU, EEA EFTA and Ukraine at 35% of component cost. No public tender was found paying more for China-free parts.

07Grants

Grants fund prototypes and assemblies

Brave1 pays component makers up to UAH 8M per grant, about USD 180,000. No drone-material call was found.

08Engines

Small jet engines depend mainly on European supplier capacity

PBS, one of a few European suppliers, says its capacity is at its limit. One interceptor in Ukrainian service flies on Chinese engines.

Source: DARC Research, section 01
76.7%
Section 10 · The demand to switch

of 30 Ukrainian manufacturers polled would drop Chinese sourcing for competitive alternatives. All but one still import some Chinese components.

In our conversations with Ukrainian makers, the wish to switch comes up almost every time. What holds them back is doubt that a partner can match the price, quality and volume.

Neither Ukraine nor Europe can yet replace Chinese suppliers on scale, speed and price, says Vita Holod of Ukraine's National Academy of Sciences.

Source: Snake Island Institute and Ukrainian Council of Defence Industry poll, via DARC Research, section 10
Exhibit 1 · Section 02

What Ukrainian producers
already make

Share of each component group made in Ukraine, from interviews with manufacturers.

Frames and housings
Structure
85%
Communication and control
Links and receivers
50-70%
Flight stacks, motors, thermal cameras
Core electronics
up to 25%
EW equipment
Antennas, cables, mechanics
5%
Digital video links, day cameras
Transmitters and receivers
almost entirely absent
Price

Alternatives exist but cost more. Price gaps respond to procurement terms and tax parity.

Capability

Non-Chinese makers lack the volume or specification needed. These gaps close with capacity backed by multi-year purchase commitments.

Material

The chokepoint sits upstream of a part Ukraine already makes. It closes only when a non-Chinese material chain exists.

Motor-G says it reached 200,000 motors a month in Ukraine by February 2026. Most of its magnets still come from China, it says.
Source: IRON Cluster and Snake Island Institute, Components of Freedom, via DARC Research, Exhibit 1 and sections 02 and 4.1
Sections 03 and 04 · Layer map

Seven chokepoints.
Who can close each one

Component classMade in UkraineChokepoint layerWhy China winsWho can close it
4.1NdFeB magnets and motorsMotors; no magnet production foundMagnets, rare-earth feedstockMaterialNon-Chinese magnet chains on prepaid offtake
4.2Battery cells, packs and BMSPacks; no cell production foundCells; cathode and anode inputsMaterial and priceKorean and Taiwanese cells; non-Chinese material chains
4.3Thermal imaging cores and camerasCamera assembly; no die productionMicrobolometer dieCapability at volume, then priceEuropean core makers on multi-year commitments
4.4Optical fibreSpool winding; no fibre drawingFibre, preform, drawing capacityCapability and priceNon-Chinese fibre makers; a licensed drawing plant
4.5Video and control radio linksAnalogue links, ELRS receivers; digital near absentChips; finished digital linksPrice and scaleUkrainian makers on non-Chinese RF silicon
4.6Flight controllers, ESCs and computeBoards on non-Chinese microcontrollersFinished stacks; discretes and passivesPrice and taxUkrainian board makers, with tax parity
4.7Mavic-class multirotorsUkrainian analogs at the front since 2025Finished platformPrice and integrationUkrainian designs, some built abroad

Eleven more classes in section 05: frames and carbon fibre, day cameras, EW hardware, RF detectors, energetics, FPV ground control, GNSS and anti-jam antennas, small engines, UGV and heavy drivetrains, production tooling.

Exhibit 2 · Section 02

China's share of Ukrainian import value, January to September 2025

Permanent magnets
HS 8505.11
95.7%
Optical fibre cable
HS 8544.70
95.6%
Optical fibre
HS 9001.10
91.8%
DC motors
HS 8501.31
88.6%
Lithium-ion cells
HS 8507.60
72.9%

These customs codes also cover civilian goods, so the shares measure concentration across all users. Lithium-ion cells are the only code where China's share fell.

Source: UN Comtrade, Ukraine as reporter, via DARC Research, Exhibit 2 and Annex A
Exhibit 3 · Section 04

What a non-Chinese option costs
against the Chinese one

Multiple of the Chinese price for a comparable part. Bases, channels and dates differ by row.

Ukrainian optionOther non-Chinese optionChinese price, 1x
Video transmitter
Ukrainian FT against Foxeer
0.93x
Video link pair
Ukrainian FT against Chinese pairs
1.01-1.05x
Mavic-class, day
Vyriy SLAVIC against Mavic 3E
1.21-1.36x
Battery packs
Samsung cells against Lishen, per Ah
1.31x
Battery packs
Molicel cells against Lishen, per Ah
1.51x
Optical fibre
US, Korean, Japanese, Italian, per km
up to 1.67x
Flight stack
NDAA-compliant against SpeedyBee
over 2.5x
Mavic-class, thermal
Parrot ANAFI UKR against Mavic 3T
3.6x
Thermal camera
European or US components
4-5x
1.2M+
thermal sensors a year used in Ukraine, by Odd Systems' count
< 0.5M
sensors a year made in Europe, says The Fourth Law's CEO
1M
sensors a year planned at Odd Camera Factory One in Ukraine, where building has begun
In video links a Ukrainian transmitter already lists 7.1% below a Chinese one. In thermal imaging the gap is 4 to 5 times.
Source: DARC Research, Exhibits 3 and 5, sections 4.2 to 4.7. Company claims are marked as such in the report
Exhibit 10 · Section 08

Four routes
for a non-Chinese supplier

The EU's Ukraine Support Loan sets aside an indicative EUR 60bn for Ukraine's defence industry, with origin rules attached. Brave1 pays Ukrainian applicants. In joint programmes the partner government pays the foreign side.

Route 01

Supply Ukrainian producers

Sell components into Ukrainian assembly lines. Brave1's 2024 grant rules allowed grantees to buy components.

In practice: some Ukrainian firms turned to South Korean cells for their own packs in 2025
Route 02

Licensed production or a JV

Build with a Ukrainian company. A Ukrainian legal entity can apply for Brave1 grants of up to UAH 8M.

In practice: Airlogix and PBS Velká Bítea, July 2026 memorandum on small turbine engines
Route 03

Joint programmes

Under Resolution No. 829 the partner government funds the foreign side. UNITE Brave NATO pays up to EUR 1M per joint project, BRAVE FRANCE up to EUR 1M per grant. Neither had published winners by the cut-off.

Also: EU companies apply directly to BraveTech EU DefTech Forges, prizes of about EUR 120k
Route 04

Nearshore plant

Produce outside Ukraine and supply Ukrainian assembly lines. EU makers under third-country control stay eligible for loan work after screening.

In practice: some Taiwanese drone firms opened production in Lithuania and Poland to serve Ukraine
Brave1 domestic grants go only to entities registered in Ukraine. A foreign company needs a Ukrainian entity or a joint programme.
Source: DARC Research, Exhibit 10 and section 08
Sections 08 and 09

Where buyers pay for origin

US · NDAA section 848

The Department of Defense cannot buy drones with flight controllers, radios, data links, cameras or gimbals made in China. From 1 January 2027 its magnet ban reaches material mined, refined or separated there.

EU · SAFE and the Ukraine Support Loan

Components from outside the EU, EEA EFTA and Ukraine are capped at 35% of component cost. The first drone tranche waived the cap for engines, flight controllers and batteries, the FT reported.

Grants · Section 09

Every themed call found funds finished parts or complete systems. No public call was found for cells, magnets, chips, thermal sensor dies or optical fibre.

No public FPV tender was found paying more for a China-free bill of materials.
Source: DARC Research, Exhibits 10 and 11
Section 06 · Dates to watch

The next three months

10 Nov 2026China

China's suspended October 2025 export controls take effect unless extended, including No. 58 on battery materials and No. 61 on rare-earth magnet materials.

27 Nov 2026China and the US

The suspension of China's ban on gallium, germanium and antimony exports to the US ends.

1 Jan 2027China

China's battery export VAT rebate, cut from 9% to 6% in April 2026, ends.

1 Jan 2027United States

The Department of Defense ban on NdFeB and SmCo magnets from China extends to material mined, refined or separated there, with exceptions.

Source: DARC Research, section 06. Status as at the research cut-off, 14 September 2026
Section 10

The counter-evidence,
stated fairly

Chinese supply keeps flowing. All but one of the 30 manufacturers polled still import some Chinese components. The EU loan waiver for engines, flight controllers and batteries points the same way.

The report keeps this in view. Each chokepoint names who can close it, with the price and volume they offer today. The gap is real, and so is the cost of closing it.

What a supplier should plan for

  • The 10 November date. China suspended 6 export control announcements until then. No extension was reported by 6 September 2026.
  • Informal pressure. IRON Cluster's co-founder says Beijing blocks component supplies to countries such as Poland and the Baltic states when it expects the goods to reach Ukraine.
  • Tax. The price gap with Chinese parts is 8% to 29%, mostly tax, say IRON Cluster and Technological Forces of Ukraine. Bills passed on 3 September 2026 extend the relief once signed.
  • Domestic content. Drone makers above 50% domestic component value qualify for guaranteed contracts. On our reading, Taiwanese or European parts count against that threshold as Chinese ones do.
  • Payment terms. Drone makers can take advances of up to 70% on the DOT-Chain Defence marketplace since 28 April 2026. Some producers still report unpaid deliveries.
Source: DARC Research, section 10
Ukraine's Chinese Component Gaps · DARC Research

Are you a
component manufacturer?

Tell us what you make, and we will show you where it fits in Ukraine: buyers, grants and routes in.

Not ready for a call? Message us with what you make: partnerships@darcdefence.com